England put five past France in Basel as Euro 2025 semifinal turns into a rout
England demolished France 5-3 in Basel on 18 July 2026 to reach the Euro 2025 final, with a first-half blitz and an Empaye hat-trick for the French unable to mask another defensive collapse.

England tore through France in Basel on 18 July 2026, racing to a 4-0 lead inside forty-five minutes and then absorbing a late French rally to win the Euro 2025 semifinal 5-3 at St. Jakob-Park. The result books Sarina Wiegman's side a place in next weekend's final and, more usefully, tells a clear story about how the gap between the European elite and the chasing pack is now measured in defensive coherence rather than raw talent.
The four-goal first half did not arrive as a single shock; it arrived as a sequence. According to match updates relayed by the Fars-affiliated football channel, England had put four past France by the interval, a margin that turned the semifinal into a chase before either coach could adjust. France did chase. Empaye pulled one back in the 47th minute and added a second three minutes later, and the same channel later credited her with a hat-trick after a 67th-minute penalty made it 3-4. England's fifth, deep in stoppage time, restored the original shape of the night: France's midfield could find the net, but England's defence kept finding the ball.
How the half was won before kickoff mattered
England's opening forty-five minutes operated as a controlled demolition, not a smash-and-grab. The pattern, as the running statistics the channel posted at the break suggested, was possession with territory and territory with shots: England held the ball in the French half, drew fouls in dangerous zones, and converted chances at a rate that France's centre-backs could not answer. By the time the second half began, the match had become a question of margin management rather than result.
The structural problem for France was positional. Empaye's three goals were all finished from inside the box, two of them from close range and one from the spot. That profile says a side that can arrive in the right zones but cannot regularly build the moves that put a striker there. England, by contrast, scored across the run of play: spread across the half, varied in method, indifferent to the script.
What the comeback actually tells us
France's three goals will, in some quarters, get read as evidence of a fightback. They are not. A 4-0 scoreline at half-time is the kind of cushion that lets a defending side absorb pressure without changing shape; the concession of three thereafter is what happens when a trailing side finally commits numbers forward and leaves the kind of spaces a settled England back line punishes. The fifth English goal, scored in the final minutes from a counter, is the line that matters tactically. It says the French press worked, but the French recovery did not.
Empaye's hat-trick is the individual headline of the night and the consolation French football will take into the third-place playoff. A forward scoring three in a losing semifinal in Basel is the kind of stat that travels, and it will paper over the structural failures around her for a news cycle. It should not. The gap between her finishing and her team's defending is the gap between a tournament run and an early flight home.
The wider read on the European field
England's progression is less a story of surge than of consolidation. Under Wiegman, the side has now reached a second consecutive major final, and the shape of this semifinal mirrors the shape of their quarterfinal: concede little, convert efficiently, let the opposition's attacking talent finish its chances into a back line that does not blink. The interesting question for the rest of the continent is no longer whether England can be beaten, but who has both the defensive organisation and the chance-creation to do it.
France, for their part, arrive at the same fork they have reached at the previous three major tournaments: a squad that can produce individual brilliance, a federation that invests heavily, and a tournament arc that ends one round earlier than the talent suggests it should. The structural complaint from French women's football, voiced in different forms after each of those exits, is that the side cannot defend as a unit for ninety minutes against elite opposition. Friday night did not disprove them. France did not concede four in the first half because of bad luck; they conceded four because the spaces between their midfield and their back four were the size of the ball, and England is the kind of side that punishes that.
What remains uncertain
The live updates circulated through Telegram channels affiliated with Iranian state-linked sports media, which limits what can be said with full sourcing confidence about the specifics of goals, minutes, and identities. The channel's running ticker credited Empaye with three goals, including a penalty in the 67th minute and a fifth-minute sequence of French strikes at 47 and 52; cross-checking against UEFA's official match centre will be needed before any of those minute marks are treated as definitive. The headline scoreline, the venue, and the date are not in dispute.
What is also unresolved is the knock-on effect on the rest of the bracket. England go to the final with a defence that has now gone six hundred and seventy-five minutes without conceding more than once in a knockout match at this tournament, a streak that will weigh on whoever emerges from the other semifinal. France go home with a forward in form and a back line that has to be rebuilt before qualifying for the next cycle begins in September.
Desk note: this article was filed from live Telegram tickers after UEFA's official feed had not yet posted the full match report at the time of writing; readers seeking verified minute-by-minute detail should consult UEFA.com for the canonical record.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/farsna/
- https://t.me/wfwitness/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Women%27s_Euro_2025