Sa'ar courts South American foreign ministers in Washington as Israel seeks to lock in post-2023 diplomatic realignment
Israel's foreign minister met his Argentine, Paraguayan and Bolivian counterparts in Washington, the latest signal that the hemisphere's centre of gravity on the Jewish state is shifting under Milei, Peña and the new La Paz government.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar sat down in Washington on the evening of 15 July 2026 with the foreign ministers of Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia, a meeting convened while the diplomats were in the US capital for separate engagements. The encounter, confirmed by Israeli and Argentine diplomatic channels, brings together three governments that, taken together, mark a striking turn in South America's posture toward the Jewish state.
The gathering is the diplomatic residue of a longer reorientation. Argentina under President Javier Milei has already moved to deepen ties; Paraguay under President Santiago Peña has stayed the course of one of the region's most robust Israel relationships; and Bolivia, whose government changed course in late 2025, has signalled it is open to a reset. The Washington meeting is the first time the three have been brought into the same room at foreign-minister level since that realignment began, and the choice of venue, neutral US ground rather than a Latin American capital, tells its own story about who brokered the conversation.
Milei, Peña and the new La Paz
The Milei government in Buenos Aires made Israel policy a pointed break with its predecessor. President Alberto Fernández's administration had kept Argentina in the more cautious middle of the Mercosur pack; under Milei, the foreign ministry has framed Israel as a strategic partner and moved to align Buenos Aires more closely with Jerusalem on multilateral votes. Sa'ar's meeting with Argentine Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein in Washington is the continuation of a relationship that has produced ministerial visits, intelligence-sharing discussions and trade missions in both directions over the past eighteen months.
Paraguay is the older constant. It hosts one of the largest Palestinian diaspora communities in Latin America, and yet under Santiago Peña has refused to follow the regional herd on Israel, maintaining its embassy in Jerusalem and resisting pressure to downgrade ties. Peña's foreign minister, Rubén Ramírez Lezcano, was in Washington this week for meetings at the Organization of American States, and the Sa'ar sit-down slotted into that itinerary. The Paraguayan posture is unusual in the region for combining a substantial Arab-descended electorate with a government that has made a domestic political choice to stay close to Israel.
Bolivia is the new variable. The government that took office in La Paz in late 2025 has moved away from the rupture with Israel that defined the Evo Morales and Luis Arce years, when ties were downgraded and cooperation projects frozen. The exact texture of the new Bolivian position is still emerging; the Washington meeting is the first public signal that the foreign ministry in La Paz is willing to be photographed next to its Israeli counterpart.
Why Washington, why now
Choosing the US capital as the venue is not incidental. The Trump administration has invested heavily in the diplomatic realignment of Latin America on a range of files, from migration and security cooperation to the posture of regional blocs toward Israel and toward Iran-aligned governments in Caracas and La Paz. A trilateral sitting under Washington's shadow benefits from a host that wants the meeting to succeed and has the leverage to smooth over the rougher edges of three foreign ministries that have not always been in the same diplomatic time zone.
The timing also matters. Regional foreign ministers descend on Washington each year for the OAS general assembly and, increasingly, for a parallel calendar of bilateral meetings on the margins. The State Department has used those windows to convene groupings that would be harder to assemble in, say, Buenos Aires or Asunción, where the optics of an Israel-centric summit would draw more domestic protest. In Washington, the meeting is one item among many on a packed schedule, and the press footprint is correspondingly smaller.
What the region is signalling
The South American picture is not uniform. Brazil under President Lula has kept its criticism of Israeli military operations in Gaza at a consistent pitch, and the Lula government has been the loudest voice in the region on Palestinian statehood. Chile, also under the left, has recalled ambassadors and downgraded ties in past cycles. Colombia under Gustavo Petro has been openly hostile at moments. The Milei-Peña-La Paz trio does not represent a regional consensus; it represents the opposite, a coalition of the willing within a region that is otherwise split.
The counter-frame is that the meeting is mostly symbolic. Three foreign ministers photographed in a Washington hotel room does not, on its own, produce trade flows, security cooperation or a regional voting bloc at the UN General Assembly. The Milei government's enthusiasm is genuine but bounded by the size of the Argentine economy and the constraints of Mercosur's external-tariff architecture. Paraguay is a small state whose bilateral moves get noticed but rarely move continental politics. Bolivia's new direction is still being negotiated inside La Paz and has not been stress-tested.
The honest read is somewhere between those poles. Diplomatic recognition is the precondition for the rest: trade missions, agricultural-technology cooperation, defence industry links, intelligence sharing. The Washington meeting is the photo-op that allows the slower work to begin. For Israel, after the diplomatic battering of 2023 and 2024, the value of a quiet, well-lit picture with three South American foreign ministers is not zero. For Argentina, Paraguay and the new Bolivia, the value is the access that comes with being seen as a partner in Washington rather than a critic in absentia.
What is still uncertain
The most consequential unknown is Bolivia. The government that sent its foreign minister to Washington is the same government that is still negotiating its own coalition arithmetic at home, and the new Bolivian posture on Israel has not yet been tested by a vote at the UN General Assembly, by a major bilateral incident, or by sustained domestic pressure from the movements that defined the Morales era. Whether the La Paz realignment is a strategic decision or a tactical accommodation to the Trump administration's pressure on a range of Bolivia's other files remains to be seen.
The Argentine side is more legible. Milei's foreign policy is ideologically coherent and has been remarkably stable across its first two years; the question is whether it survives a change of administration, since Argentine foreign-policy swings between governments of different stripes are the rule rather than the exception. Paraguay under Peña is into the second half of its mandate, and the next presidential cycle will introduce a new variable.
What can be said is that on 15 July 2026 in Washington, three South American foreign ministers chose to be in the same room as their Israeli counterpart, and chose to be photographed doing so. The meeting is one data point in a longer curve, but it is a data point on the upward side, and it was assembled with the quiet help of a US administration that wants the curve to keep bending that way.
Desk note: Monexus has treated this story as a diplomatic-posture file rather than a Middle East conflict file, since the action is in Washington and the principals are three South American foreign ministers. The Israeli framing in the source material is taken at face value as the account of an Israeli government channel; the regional counter-position, centred on Brasília and Bogotá, is supplied here as the alternate read the source does not contain.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/abualiexpress