Tasnim bulletins track explosions in Erbil and Sulaymaniyah within a twenty-minute window
Six Telegram posts from Tasnim's English, Arabic, and Persian-language channels logged blasts in Sulaymaniyah and Erbil between 23:10 and 23:30 UTC on 25 July 2026, with the later alerts naming 'separatist parties and terrorist groups' as the target category.

Six Telegram bulletins from Iranian state-affiliated outlets Tasnim News English, Tasnim Arabic, and Tasnim's Persian-language Jahan Tasnim mirror logged explosions in two Iraqi cities inside a twenty-minute window beginning at 23:10 UTC on 25 July 2026. The first alert, posted at 23:10 UTC on Jahan Tasnim, reported an explosion heard in Sulaymaniyah in northern Iraq. A minute later, at 23:11 UTC, Tasnim English carried the same line. At 23:17 UTC, Tasnim Arabic pivoted to Erbil, also in northern Iraq, reporting an explosion there. Jahan Tasnim followed at 23:26 UTC, Tasnim English at 23:27 UTC, and at 23:30 UTC Tasnim Arabic sharpened the framing, citing "Arab sources" who reported an attack on the headquarters of what it called "separatist parties and terrorist groups" in Erbil. None of the six bulletins specifies casualty figures, a target identity, a perpetrator, or the type of munition used.
The thread is exclusively Iranian state media. The bulletin sequence shows Tasnim's three channels operating in near-lockstep, with Arabic and Persian-language posts inside one to four minutes of each other on each new item. The framing moved from a flat "explosion heard" line at 23:10 UTC to an attributed strike on a named category of target by 23:30 UTC, all within the same channel family, all on Telegram, and all before any of the source items references an outside confirmation.
The twenty-minute sequence
The bulletins describe two Iraqi cities, both in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The first item concerns Sulaymaniyah, the second Erbil. The source items do not specify which neighbourhoods were struck, the distance between the two reported blasts, or whether the two incidents are connected. The pattern the channels describe is detection across two cities in rapid succession; the bulletin trail records the alerts, not the underlying events in any independent detail.
The Telegram posts, in order of UTC timestamp: Jahan Tasnim at 23:10 reports an explosion in Sulaymaniyah; Tasnim English at 23:11 carries the same line; Tasnim Arabic at 23:17 reports an explosion in Erbil; Jahan Tasnim at 23:26 carries the same Erbil line; Tasnim English at 23:27 does likewise; and Tasnim Arabic at 23:30 cites Arab sources reporting an attack on the headquarters of separatist parties and terrorist groups in Erbil.
How the framing moved
The shift between the early and late bulletins is the most newsworthy editorial movement on the channels. The 23:10 and 23:11 alerts on Sulaymaniyah used the flat "explosion heard" formula, attributed only to "news sources." The 23:17 Erbil alert on Tasnim Arabic used the same flat "explosion heard" formulation. Then the 23:26 Jahan Tasnim post and the 23:27 Tasnim English post each carried inline text describing the same target category, the headquarters of separatist parties and terrorist groups in Erbil, that the 23:30 Tasnim Arabic alert later restated, with the attribution to "Arab sources" attached.
The available source items show the target-category framing appearing first in the 23:26 and 23:27 bulletins, then again in the 23:30 bulletin. The earlier three posts in the sequence (23:10, 23:11, 23:17) used only the flat "explosion heard" formula. The transition from flat alert to attributed target category therefore runs between 23:17 and 23:26 UTC, not solely between the 23:27 and 23:30 posts as the bulletin count alone might suggest.
Monexus analysis: the language "separatist parties and terrorist groups" is the standard formulation used by Iranian state outlets for Iranian Kurdish opposition groups operating out of Iraqi Kurdistan, including the Party of Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK) and Komala factions. The framing in the 23:26–23:30 bulletins, treating the target as Iranian Kurdish opposition infrastructure, fits the second of two operating templates the bulletin sequence could correspond to. The first template is a strike by a third party, with Iranian outlets then amplifying the blast; the second is an Iranian operation, with Tehran's own channels first to confirm. The 23:26–23:30 framing leans toward the second reading, but the source items do not state which party was hit, who struck, or whether the two blasts are connected. A definitive attribution is not supportable from this material alone.
What the source set does and does not contain
The thread is narrow. The available source items describe alerts, not events: they record that blasts were reported, not what caused them or what was hit. The bulletins do not specify casualty figures, the party targeted, the perpetrator, or the type of munition used. They do not reference any statement from the Iraqi federal government, the Kurdistan Regional Government, the U.S.-led coalition, regional consulates in Erbil, or any non-Tasnim outlet. The framing the channels choose in the bulletins above is the framing an Iranian reader will encounter first.
What remains unresolved
The most consequential questions are not answered by the available material. Who struck Erbil. Who struck Sulaymaniyah. Whether the two blasts are connected. Whether any casualties occurred. Which party headquarters, if any, were damaged. Whether outside parties have issued statements. The cited posts contain none of that material. How Reuters, AFP, the BBC, or the Associated Press elect to handle the story, and how Iraqi officials in Baghdad and Erbil frame it, will determine which of the two operating templates above is the correct reading of the night; that material is not in the source set provided for this filing.
Desk note: this article follows the available source trail, which on this event is exclusively the three Tasnim Telegram channels. Monexus treats Iranian state-affiliated bulletins as primary indicators, not as standalone factual claims, and has flagged them as such throughout. The source set is narrow by design; the article does not extend beyond what the six Telegram items support.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/tasnimplus/115811
- https://t.me/tasnimnews_en/27929
- https://t.me/JahanTasnim/226849
- https://t.me/tasnimplus/115810
- https://t.me/tasnimnews_en/27928
- https://t.me/JahanTasnim/226848