Zidane to France: the appointment the FFF has spent a decade trying not to make
The French Football Federation is moving toward naming Zinedine Zidane as head coach, ending a long courtship and a long stalemate with Didier Deschamps.

The French Football Federation is preparing to name Zinedine Zidane as the next head coach of the senior men's national team, according to reporting summarised on 18 July 2026 by LiveMint, citing journalist Fabrizio Romano. The choice, if confirmed, would end the longest-running succession question in European football and replace Didier Deschamps, who has held the post since 2012.
What is unfolding in Paris is not a coaching change. It is a closure. The FFF has circled this decision for a decade, through a 2018 World Cup win, a 2022 final loss, a Euros campaign in Germany that ran hot and cold, and a succession of Zidane flirtations with the France job that never quite landed. The federation now appears ready to convert one of the most bankable assets in the sport's history into a working manager of its flagship team.
The decade the FFF kept finding a reason to wait
Inside the federation, the case for Deschamps was always positional: continuity, dressing-room authority, an understanding of the press, and a results record that includes a 2018 world title, a 2022 final, and a semi-final exit at Euro 2024 in Germany. Off the pitch, the case against Zidane was reputational. He left Real Madrid in 2021 having won three consecutive Champions League titles. He has not held a club post since.
Romano's reporting, as relayed by LiveMint, frames the appointment as a fait accompli rather than a courtship. That is a meaningful shift. Through 2024 and 2025, the public line from FFF president Philippe Diallo and from Deschamps himself was that the existing contract would be honoured. Deschamps's deal was extended through to the next World Cup cycle, and the federation treated Zidane's availability as a question to be managed rather than a vacancy to be filled.
What changed is harder to read from outside. One reading is sporting: the gap between the manager France could hire and the manager it had narrowed to the point where the status quo became harder to defend. Another reading is political: the federation preferred the awkwardness of a vacancy over the awkwardness of a refusal.
The Zidane problem, restated
Zidane's appeal has never been tactical in the narrow sense. It is symbolic and structural. He is the most decorated French coach of his generation, fluent in Spanish and Italian footballing cultures, with a playing career that gives him unmediated authority in a dressing room built around players who grew up watching him lift trophies. He is also the only credible French candidate whose profile matches the role's commercial weight.
The counter-reading, held inside the FFF for years, is that Zidane's strengths on the touchline are partly mythical. Three Champions League wins at Real Madrid were a high-wire act; he also inherited a squad already configured by others. France, the argument goes, is a different management problem: politically charged, media-saturated, dependent on integrating young talent from a generation that includes Kylian Mbappé, Eduardo Camavinga, and Warren Zaïre-Emery. That case has aged poorly. The longer Zidane stayed outside the job, the more the federation's reasons for keeping him out looked like reasons for keeping him in.
What this means for the next cycle
The immediate calendar is the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada and Mexico, which begins in under a year from this appointment window. If Zidane takes over now, he inherits Deschamps's squad mid-cycle, with qualifying complete and a tournament roster to set. The federation is, in effect, choosing to interrupt continuity at exactly the point where continuity is most valuable. That is a tell.
Two structural frames sit on top of the personnel story. First, the commercial gravity of the France job has grown. National-team broadcasts, sponsors, and federation revenue are now large enough that the choice of coach is a balance-sheet decision as well as a sporting one. Zidane's market value, in that frame, is not a bonus; it is the rationale. Second, the European coaching market has thinned at the elite level. The pool of coaches who can manage both a squad of France's profile and the political weather around it is small. Zidane is the largest remaining name in it.
The risks are concrete. Zidane has not coached a club game since May 2021. His staff will be assembled quickly, against a calendar that does not wait. The federation is also betting that the dressing room, which Deschamps managed through a long and sometimes tense era, will accept a different voice without friction.
The next questions to watch
Three dates will define whether this is a clean handover or a drawn-out negotiation. The first is the formal announcement, which LiveMint's reporting places as imminent but which the FFF has not yet confirmed on the record. The second is the first squad announcement under Zidane, which will reveal whether the staff he brings is a Real Madrid expatriate operation or a federation-aligned technical setup. The third is the March 2026 international window, the last meaningful test before the World Cup.
The honest uncertainty here is that the sources describing the appointment are working from Romano's reporting, which is the strongest signal in the transfer market but is not the federation's own statement. The FFF has, in the past, allowed Zidane rumours to harden into near-certainty before pulling back. There is no public reason, on the evidence available on 18 July 2026, to expect that pattern to repeat. But there is also no FFF press release on file confirming the move.
What is already settled is the shape of the decision. The federation is not choosing between Zidane and an alternative candidate. It is choosing between Zidane now and Zidane later, and it has decided that later is the more expensive option.
How Monexus framed this: a coaching story as a federation governance story, with the commercial weight of the France job treated as the structural driver rather than the dressing-room angle that the sports press tends to lead with.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/s/livemint/