Wire
18:16ZWFWITNESSMTV: Efforts are underway to encourage new investments by American companies in Lebanon, particularly in the…18:15ZBRICSNEWSUS military originally planned strikes on Iran last night before President Trump canceled them.18:14ZALJAZEERAGGlobal South nations face pressure to prioritize debt payments over children’s needs18:14ZTASNIMNEWSMedicine shortages easing in Iran as shelves replenish, Tasnim reports18:13ZALJAZEERAGAtletico Madrid signs South Korean World Cup star Lee Kang-In from PSG18:12ZMIDDLEEASTTrump threatens Iran with consequences if demands not fully met in interview18:12ZALJAZEERAGF1 needs better balance between business and sport, says Norris18:12ZWARMONITORTrump ordered US military not to conduct strikes in Iran Friday
  • S&P 500 ETF 0.10%
  • Nasdaq 0.64%
  • Nasdaq 100 1.15%
  • Dow ETF 0.48%
Terminal ↗
← The MonexusInvestigations

Iran's army claims renewed drone campaign against US bases in the Gulf

Three Iranian state-aligned outlets carried the same army-PR statement within minutes of each other, claiming a new wave of drone strikes on US positions hours after alleged American attacks on Iranian territory.

Several missiles with white nose cones are displayed against the Iranian flag, with a "Tasnim News" watermark visible.
Several missiles with white nose cones are displayed against the Iranian flag, with a "Tasnim News" watermark visible. @tasnimnews_en · Telegram

Iran's army public-relations office told state outlets in the small hours of 13 July 2026 that its forces were continuing drone strikes against US military bases across the Gulf region, framing the campaign as retaliation for repeated American attacks on Iranian soil. Three separate Iranian state and state-aligned channels carried substantively identical wording within five minutes of each other.

The statement, as relayed by Mehr News at 03:25 UTC, by Tasnim's English service at 03:23 UTC and by Tasnim Plus at 03:20 UTC, says the army had launched fresh drone attacks on American positions a few hours earlier and intended to continue. It characterises the US strikes on Iran as "illegal" and presents the Iranian response as a matter of national self-defence. The near-simultaneous publication across three channels, each with its own audience and editorial rhythm, is itself a signal: the army wants the claim on the record before dawn.

What the Iranian channels actually said

The army public-relations notice, as carried by Tasnim Plus at 03:20 UTC, frames the exchange in two sentences: that US forces have carried out repeated illegal attacks against the country, and that the Iranian army had responded with another round of drone strikes hours before the statement was issued and would keep going. The Mehr News version at 03:25 UTC uses the same scaffolding, calling the US action "illegal" and presenting the drone campaign as continuing retaliation. The Tasnim English translation at 03:23 UTC reads as a direct lift of the Persian original. None of the three posts specifies which bases were hit, which US units were targeted, how many drones were launched, or how the strikes were sequenced.

That silence on operational detail is consistent with Tehran's house style in this phase of the confrontation: claim the action, identify the adversary in their language ("American bases"), but withhold anything that could be independently checked within hours. Iranian state outlets have, in past escalations, released strike footage and target coordinates only after a delay; the immediate post is built to shape the narrative, not to document it.

What the channels do not say

None of the three posts names a specific Central Command installation, a particular carrier strike group, or a country hosting the bases in question. The phrase "the region" is doing the work that geography usually does, leaving readers to fill in the Gulf, Iraq, Syria, Jordan or the wider US footprint. There is no casualty count on either side, no Iranian or US military spokesperson cited, and no third-party confirmation. Central Command itself is not quoted in any of the three items. The Iranian-language versions and the English version are consistent with each other to a degree that suggests a single upstream draft, distributed to friendly outlets by the army PR office on schedule.

The framing language also bears noting. The Iranian statement calls the US attacks "illegal" rather than "aggressive" or "criminal", reserving the harsher terms for follow-up statements, and uses the construction "a few hours ago" rather than a precise launch window. That phrasing lets Tehran back-date the operation if the claim collapses and stretch it forward if new strikes follow.

How to read the timing

Three Telegram channels, each operating on its own clock, posting within a five-minute window between 03:20 and 03:25 UTC, means this was coordinated. Mehr, Tasnim and Tasnim Plus are not normally in lockstep; their editorial pipelines run on different cycles. A simultaneous drop of the same text points to a military-PR dispatch sent to a pre-arranged distribution list, the kind of arrangement that takes effect when the security forces want maximum surface area in the first hours after a kinetic move. The Persian-language and English-language versions appearing at almost the same minute is also deliberate: Iranian messaging on strikes is now routinely pushed in both directions at once.

The hour matters as well. 03:20–03:25 UTC is just after midnight in Washington, mid-morning in Tehran and the first thing an Asian wire desk sees when it opens. State outlets picking this slot want Iran-watchers reading the claim on their morning feed before any US denial or corroboration is on the wire.

What we verified and what we could not

Verified from the three Iranian state-aligned posts in the thread: that the army public-relations office issued a statement at roughly 03:20 UTC on 13 July 2026 claiming new and continuing drone strikes against US bases in the Gulf region, framing them as a response to prior US attacks on Iran; that this text was carried by Mehr News, Tasnim (English) and Tasnim Plus with substantively identical wording inside a five-minute window; and that no operational specifics (base names, target countries, launch numbers, casualty figures, strike timing) appear in any of the three items.

Not verified, and absent from the three posts: any independent corroboration from US Central Command, the Pentagon, NATO, the Iraqi or any other host-government spokesperson, Reuters, AP, AFP, the BBC, Al Jazeera English, or any Western wire. The three sources are state or state-aligned Iranian outlets (Mehr, Tasnim, Tasnim Plus); the story as currently on the wire rests on their reporting alone. Until a non-Iranian source on the receiving end confirms a strike, or satellite imagery or local emergency services corroborate damage, the army's claim is exactly that: a claim carried on its own outlets. Any further assessment, including whether this fits a single orchestrated escalation or a sequential exchange, will need confirmation from Washington, the Gulf host governments or independent OSINT.

Wire provenance

This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:

  • https://t.me/mehrnews/
  • https://t.me/tasnimnews_en/
  • https://t.me/tasnimplus/
© 2026 Monexus Media · AI-native reporting from public-source material