Netanyahu's farewell to Graham and the textbooks quietly shaping post-Assad Syria
On the day Israel buried a friend, an open-source monitor reported 65 HTS-linked textbooks still teaching armed struggle. Two stories, one uncomfortable read on what comes next.

At 14:43 UTC on 12 July 2026, the open-source monitor Open Source Intel circulated a finding that should land harder than it will: across 65 textbooks and workbooks used in kindergartens and primary schools run by groups affiliated with Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, the new governing authority in post-Assad Syria, anti-Israel material and explicit glorification of jihad and armed struggle are not fringe content. They are the curriculum. The finding, posted to Telegram on the same day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spent the morning in Jerusalem eulogising the late US Senator Lindsey Graham, joined two very different stories into one uneasy picture of what the next phase of Middle Eastern politics is actually being built on.
Netanyahu's tribute, replayed across Israeli and Telegram channels in the early afternoon UTC, was personal and pointed. He called Graham "a wonderful, wonderful friend, a great American patriot, and a great champion of the Israel-American alliance," language carried verbatim by Open Source Intel at 13:42 UTC and by Clash Report at 13:14 UTC. He then described a final conversation in which he told Graham Israel could finance its own defence; Graham, Netanyahu said, "went ballistic" and replied "No way, you can't do that!" The image Netanyahu reached for was comic-book American: "Truth, justice and the American way. That was Lindsey Graham." Read flat, it is eulogy. Read against the second story of the day, it is also policy: an Israeli leadership publicly rehearsing, the morning after an American ally's death, the case that Israel need not remain a permanent aid recipient, even as Washington's most stalwart congressional champions age out.
A morning of eulogies, a curriculum of struggle
The Syria file is the harder one. Open Source Intel's 14:43 UTC post is short, but the architecture of the claim is specific: 65 textbooks and workbooks; the network in question is HTS-aligned; the schools have now been folded into whatever passes for a post-Assad Syrian educational administration; and the content running through those books is not incidental hostility toward Israel but active indoctrination, including the glorification of armed struggle. The monitor did not, in its Telegram message, publish the title list or a page-by-page breakdown, and did not name the institutions it audited. The framing of the post, anti-Israel indoctrination running through the materials, is consistent with a body of earlier reporting on jihadist-aligned curricula in north-western Syria, but those prior reports have not always been independently corroborated line by line. What the source does establish is that a Telegram channel with a tracking footprint is publicly asserting this is the case in mid-2026, and that the assertion is being made at the moment HTS is consolidating civilian authority in Damascus.
Why the timing matters
HTS's evolution from al-Qaeda-affiliated outfit to governing administration has been the central political story inside Syria since the late-2024 offensive that ended Bashar al-Assad's rule. The question Western and regional governments have been quietly working through is whether the new authorities are willing, and able, to dismantle the ideological infrastructure that produced them, or whether they intend to govern in the language of that infrastructure while moderating its outward behaviour. Textbooks are the cleanest possible test. You can delay an election, postpone a constitution, defer recognition by foreign capitals, and still have already answered the question, because every child who sits through a year of primary school has been told by the state what counts as heroic. Open Source Intel is not arguing this is the only story; it is arguing it is the structural one.
Counter-narrative: state-building under sanctions and watchlists
The counter-read is straightforward and not unserious. The new Syrian authorities inherit an education system gutted by more than a decade of war, displacement and aerial bombing. Reconstruction of any curriculum takes years, and the staff who would write or vet replacements are themselves products of the same disrupted schooling. Western governments, including the United States, continue to designate HTS as a terrorist organisation, which constrains the kind of technical assistance that normally accompanies textbook reform. The argument from Damascus, when it bothers to engage, is that what looks like indoctrination is in fact continuity, and that continuity is what allows the state to function while its legitimacy is contested at home and abroad. The rejoinder, which the open-source post does not have to make explicitly but which a reader is entitled to draw, is that there is a difference between preserving the administrative state and preserving its ideological furniture.
Stakes: two clocks running at different speeds
The Netanyahu-Graham thread, by contrast, runs on a slower clock and points in the opposite direction. The Israeli prime minister is openly rehearsing a posture of strategic autonomy: Israeli defence financed from Israeli balance sheets, with American political cover sought rather than American military funding relied upon. The eulogy frame does double work. It honours a dead ally, and it tells the surviving ones that the relationship is changing shape. Graham's particular role in Congress, as a Republican who combined evangelical Christian Zionism with deep personal ties to the Israeli leadership, is not easily reproduced; the next generation of senior US lawmakers will arrive with different backgrounds and different pressures. Netanyahu's Superman line is not a policy document. It is a marker that Israel expects to be defended, in any future American domestic debate, in the register of values rather than the register of aid budgets.
What joins the two threads is uncomfortable. One is about how a defeated dictatorship's ideological inheritance is being repackaged as a state curriculum. The other is about how a durable alliance is being reframed for an era of tighter budgets and more sceptical publics. Neither story is being told in isolation. Both are being decided, in their different registers, by what gets normalised inside classrooms and inside Congressional hearing rooms in the months ahead.
Desk note: Monexus read two Telegram channels and found one story about alliance management in Jerusalem and another about curriculum politics in Damascus. Both will outlast the news cycle they were filed under.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/osintlive
- https://t.me/osintlive
- https://t.me/osintlive
- https://t.me/ClashReport
- https://t.me/ClashReport
- https://t.me/ClashReport